Citation: Lm. Bouter et al., METHODOLOGIC ISSUES IN LOW-BACK-PAIN RESEARCH IN PRIMARY-CARE, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(18), 1998, pp. 2014-2020
Citation: Mw. Vantulder et al., CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN IN PRIMARY-CARE - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY ON THE MANAGEMENT AND COURSE, Family practice, 15(2), 1998, pp. 126-132
Citation: Mw. Vantulder et al., METHOD GUIDELINES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION BACK REVIEW GROUP FOR SPINAL-DISORDERS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 22(20), 1997, pp. 2323-2330
Citation: Mw. Vantulder et al., CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW-BACK-PAIN- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF THE MOST COMMON INTERVENTIONS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 22(18), 1997, pp. 2128-2156
Citation: Mw. Vantulder et al., MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW-BACK-PAIN IN PRIMARY-CARE - A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 22(1), 1997, pp. 76-82
Citation: We. Vanderweide et al., VOCATIONAL OUTCOME OF INTERVENTION FOR LOW-BACK-PAIN, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 23(3), 1997, pp. 165-178
Citation: Lem. Schoppink et al., RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DUTCH ADAPTATION OF THE QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE, Physical therapy, 76(3), 1996, pp. 268-275
Citation: Bw. Koes et al., THE EFFICACY OF BACK SCHOOLS - A REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS, Journal of clinical epidemiology, 47(8), 1994, pp. 851-862