Citation: C. Wimberly, Deadbeat dads, welfare moms, and uncle Sam: How the Child Support RecoveryAct punishes single-mother families, STANF LAW R, 53(3), 2000, pp. 729-766
Citation: B. Boynton, Democracy and distrust after twenty years: Fly's process theory and constitutional law from 1990 to 2000, STANF LAW R, 53(2), 2000, pp. 397-446
Citation: Bj. Gagan, Ferguson v. City of Charleston, South Carolina: "Fetal abuse," drug testing, and the Fourth Amendment, STANF LAW R, 53(2), 2000, pp. 491-518
Citation: Jt. Molot, The judicial perspective in the administrative state: Reconciling modern doctrines of deference with the judiciary's structural role, STANF LAW R, 53(1), 2000, pp. 1-110
Citation: Dm. Franklin, The mass tort defendants strike back: Are settlement class actions a collusive threat or just a phantom menace?, STANF LAW R, 53(1), 2000, pp. 163-193
Citation: T. Ruskola, Conceptualizing corporations and kinship: Comparative law and development theory in a Chinese perspective, STANF LAW R, 52(6), 2000, pp. 1599-1729
Citation: S. Garber, Punitive damages and deterrence of efficiency-promoting analysis: A problem without a solution?, STANF LAW R, 52(6), 2000, pp. 1809-1820
Citation: Ra. Epstein, Privacy, publication, and the First Amendment: The dangers of First Amendment exceptionalism, STANF LAW R, 52(5), 2000, pp. 1003-1047