Citation: Ls. Hamilton, Detecting gender-based differential item functioning on a constructed-response science test, APPL MEAS E, 12(3), 1999, pp. 211-235
Citation: Gm. Lee et Da. Frisbie, Estimating reliability under a generalizability theory model for test scores composed of testlets, APPL MEAS E, 12(3), 1999, pp. 237-255
Citation: De. Powers et Re. Bennett, Effects of allowing examinees to select questions on a test of divergent thinking, APPL MEAS E, 12(3), 1999, pp. 257-279
Citation: Be. Clauser et al., A comparison of the generalizability of scores produced by expert raters and automated scoring systems, APPL MEAS E, 12(3), 1999, pp. 281-299
Citation: Ks. Shapley et Mj. Bush, Developing a valid and reliable portfolio assessment in the primary grades: Building on practical experience, APPL MEAS E, 12(2), 1999, pp. 111-132
Authors:
Ponsoda, V
Olea, J
Rodriguez, MS
Revuelta, J
Citation: V. Ponsoda et al., The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing, APPL MEAS E, 12(2), 1999, pp. 167-184
Authors:
Wise, SL
Finney, SJ
Enders, CK
Freeman, SA
Severance, DD
Citation: Sl. Wise et al., Examinee judgments of changes in item difficulty: Implications for item review in computerized adaptive testing, APPL MEAS E, 12(2), 1999, pp. 185-198
Citation: Ld. Goodwin, Relations between observed item difficulty levels and Angoff minimum passing levels for a group of borderline examinees, APPL MEAS E, 12(1), 1999, pp. 13-28
Citation: M. Garner et G. Engelhard, Gender differences in performance on multiple-choice and constructed response mathematics items, APPL MEAS E, 12(1), 1999, pp. 29-51
Citation: Hf. Oneil et Rs. Brown, DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF QUESTION FORMATS IN MATH ASSESSMENT ON METACOGNITION AND AFFECT, Applied measurement in education, 11(4), 1998, pp. 331-351
Citation: Tc. Oshima et al., DIFFERENTIAL BUNDLE FUNCTIONING USING THE DFIT FRAMEWORK - PROCEDURESFOR IDENTIFYING POSSIBLE SOURCES OF DIFFERENTIAL FUNCTIONING, Applied measurement in education, 11(4), 1998, pp. 353-369
Citation: G. Engelhard et Dw. Anderson, A BINOMIAL TRIALS MODEL FOR EXAMINING THE RATINGS OF STANDARD-SETTINGJUDGES, Applied measurement in education, 11(3), 1998, pp. 209-230
Citation: A. Dechamplain et Me. Gessaroli, ASSESSING THE DIMENSIONALITY OF ITEM RESPONSE MATRICES WITH SMALL SAMPLE SIZES AND SHORT TEST LENGTHS, Applied measurement in education, 11(3), 1998, pp. 231-253
Citation: Lf. Wightman, AN EXAMINATION OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN LSAT SCORES FROM THE PERSPECTIVEOF SOCIAL-CONSEQUENCES, Applied measurement in education, 11(3), 1998, pp. 255-277