Citation: Mw. Peterson et Mk. Einarson, What are colleges doing about student assessment? - Does it make a difference?, J HIGH EDUC, 72(6), 2001, pp. 629
Citation: Ka. Feldman et al., A further investigation of major field and person-environment fit - Sociological versus psychological interpretations of Holland's theory, J HIGH EDUC, 72(6), 2001, pp. 670
Citation: N. Hativa et al., Exemplary university teachers - Knowledge and beliefs regarding effective teaching dimensions and strategies, J HIGH EDUC, 72(6), 2001, pp. 699
Citation: Dt. Shapiro, Modeling supply and demand for arts and sciences faculty - What ten years of data tell us about the labor market projections of Bowen and Sosa, J HIGH EDUC, 72(5), 2001, pp. 532
Citation: Lw. Perna, The relationship between family responsibilities and employment status among college and university faculty, J HIGH EDUC, 72(5), 2001, pp. 584
Citation: D. Covell et Ca. Barr, The ties that bind - Presidential involvement with the development of NCAAdivision I initial eligibility legislation, J HIGH EDUC, 72(4), 2001, pp. 414-452
Citation: Jg. Donald et Db. Denison, Quality assessment of university students - Student perceptions of qualitycriteria, J HIGH EDUC, 72(4), 2001, pp. 478-502
Citation: Sp. Hu et Ep. St John, Student persistence in a public higher education system - Understanding racial and ethnic differences, J HIGH EDUC, 72(3), 2001, pp. 265-286
Citation: Mm. Kim, Institutional effectiveness of women-only colleges - Cultivating students'desire to influence social conditions, J HIGH EDUC, 72(3), 2001, pp. 287-321
Citation: Yf. De Valero, Departmental factors affecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land-grant research institution, J HIGH EDUC, 72(3), 2001, pp. 341-367