Citation: M. Kelman, BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AS PART OF A RHETORICAL DUET - A RESPONSE TO JOLLS, SUNSTEIN, AND THALER, Stanford law review, 50(5), 1998, pp. 1577-1591
Citation: Ja. Drobac, FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN - COURT CONSIDERATION OF RELIGION IN CHILD-CUSTODY CASES, Stanford law review, 50(5), 1998, pp. 1609-1670
Citation: M. Gimbel, SOME THOUGHTS ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF TRUSTED SYSTEMS FOR INTELLECTUALPROPERTY LAW, Stanford law review, 50(5), 1998, pp. 1671-1687
Citation: Pg. Cassell et R. Fowles, HANDCUFFING THE COPS - A 30-YEAR PERSPECTIVE ON MIRANDAS HARMFUL EFFECTS ON LAW-ENFORCEMENT, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1055-1145
Citation: Pg. Cassell et R. Fowles, FALLING CLEARANCE RATES AFTER MIRANDA - COINCIDENCE OR CONSEQUENCE, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1181-1191
Citation: E. Harmerdionne, ONCE A PECULIAR PEOPLE - COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE AND THE SUPPRESSION OF MORMON POLYGAMY AS A CASE-STUDY NEGATING THE BELIEF-ACTION DISTINCTION, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1295-1347
Citation: Mm. Shors, UNITED-STATES V WATTS - UNANSWERED QUESTIONS, ACQUITTAL ENHANCEMENTS,AND THE FUTURE OF DUE-PROCESS AND THE AMERICAN CRIMINAL JURY, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1349-1393
Citation: Nw. Spaulding, THE PROPHET AND THE BUREAUCRAT - POSITIONAL CONFLICTS IN-SERVICE PRO-BONO-PUBLICO, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1395-1434
Citation: S. Issacharoff et Rh. Pildes, POLITICS AS MARKETS - PARTISAN LOCKUPS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 643-717
Citation: Rl. Hasen, THE POLITICAL MARKET METAPHOR AND ELECTION LAW - A COMMENT ON ISSACHAROFF AND PILDES, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 719-730
Citation: I. Ayres et J. Bulow, THE DONATION BOOTH - MANDATING DONOR ANONYMITY TO DISRUPT THE MARKET FOR POLITICAL INFLUENCE, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 837-891