AAAAAA
Results: 1-25/119
Authors:
Conway, JM
Lombardo, K
Sanders, KC
Citation: Jm. Conway et al., A meta-analysis of incremental validity and nomological networks for subordinate and peer ratings, HUM PERFORM, 14(4), 2001, pp. 267-303
Authors:
Keown-Gerrard, JL
Sulsky, LM
Citation: Jl. Keown-gerrard et Lm. Sulsky, The effects of task information training and frame-of-reference training with situational constraints on rating accuracy, HUM PERFORM, 14(4), 2001, pp. 305-320
Authors:
Jagacinski, CM
Madden, JL
Reider, MH
Citation: Cm. Jagacinski et al., The impact of situational and dispositional achievement goals on performance, HUM PERFORM, 14(4), 2001, pp. 321-337
Authors:
Ishizaka, K
Marshall, SP
Conte, JM
Citation: K. Ishizaka et al., Individual differences in attentional strategies in multitasking situations, HUM PERFORM, 14(4), 2001, pp. 339-358
Authors:
Chen, G
Casper, WJ
Cortina, JM
Citation: G. Chen et al., The roles of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and work-related performance: A meta-analytic examination, HUM PERFORM, 14(3), 2001, pp. 209-230
Authors:
Gellatly, IR
Irving, PG
Citation: Ir. Gellatly et Pg. Irving, Personality, autonomy, and contextual performance of managers, HUM PERFORM, 14(3), 2001, pp. 231-245
Authors:
Seijts, GH
Jackson, SE
Citation: Gh. Seijts et Se. Jackson, Reactions to employment equity programs and situational interviews: A laboratory study, HUM PERFORM, 14(3), 2001, pp. 247-265
Authors:
Beaty, JC
Cleveland, JN
Murphy, KR
Citation: Jc. Beaty et al., The relation between personality and contextual performance in "strong" versus "weak" situations, HUM PERFORM, 14(2), 2001, pp. 125-148
Authors:
Clause, CS
Delbridge, K
Schmitt, N
Chan, D
Jennings, D
Citation: Cs. Clause et al., Test preparation activities and employment test performance, HUM PERFORM, 14(2), 2001, pp. 149-167
Authors:
Mangos, PM
Steele-Johnson, D
Citation: Pm. Mangos et D. Steele-johnson, The role of subjective task complexity in goal orientation, self-efficacy,and performance relations, HUM PERFORM, 14(2), 2001, pp. 169-186
Authors:
Robie, C
Zickar, MJ
Schmit, MJ
Citation: C. Robie et al., Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups: An IRT analysis of personality scales, HUM PERFORM, 14(2), 2001, pp. 187-207
Authors:
Farr, JL
Citation: Jl. Farr, Contributions by new editorial board members - Editorial and introduction, HUM PERFORM, 14(1), 2001, pp. 1-2
Authors:
Noonan, LE
Sulsky, LM
Citation: Le. Noonan et Lm. Sulsky, Impact of frame-of-reference and behavioral observation training on alternative training effectiveness criteria in a Canadian military sample, HUM PERFORM, 14(1), 2001, pp. 3-26
Authors:
Burr, R
Cordery, JL
Citation: R. Burr et Jl. Cordery, Self-management efficacy as a mediator of the relation between job design and employee motivation, HUM PERFORM, 14(1), 2001, pp. 27-44
Authors:
Ryan, AM
Citation: Am. Ryan, Explaining the Black-White test score gap: The role of test perceptions, HUM PERFORM, 14(1), 2001, pp. 45-75
Authors:
Chan, D
Citation: D. Chan, Method effects of positive affectivity, negative affectivity, and impression management in self-reports of work attitudes, HUM PERFORM, 14(1), 2001, pp. 77-96
Authors:
Fay, D
Frese, M
Citation: D. Fay et M. Frese, The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies, HUM PERFORM, 14(1), 2001, pp. 97-124
Authors:
Lance, CE
Newbolt, WH
Gatewood, RD
Foster, MR
French, NR
Smith, DE
Citation: Ce. Lance et al., Assessment center exercise factors represent cross-situational specificity, not method bias, HUM PERFORM, 13(4), 2000, pp. 323-353
Authors:
Robie, C
Osburn, HG
Morris, MA
Etchegaray, JM
Adams, KA
Citation: C. Robie et al., Effects of the rating process on the construct validity of assessment center dimension evaluations, HUM PERFORM, 13(4), 2000, pp. 355-370
Authors:
Jackson, DN
Wroblewski, VR
Ashton, MC
Citation: Dn. Jackson et al., The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution?, HUM PERFORM, 13(4), 2000, pp. 371-388
Authors:
Tett, RP
Guterman, HA
Bleier, A
Murphy, PJ
Citation: Rp. Tett et al., Development and content validation of a "hyperdimensional" taxonomy of managerial competence, HUM PERFORM, 13(3), 2000, pp. 205-251
Authors:
Lance, CE
Johnson, CD
Douthitt, SS
Bennett, W
Harville, DL
Citation: Ce. Lance et al., Good news: Work sample administrators' global performance judgments are (about) as valid as we've suspected, HUM PERFORM, 13(3), 2000, pp. 253-277
Authors:
Seijts, GH
Latham, GP
Whyte, G
Citation: Gh. Seijts et al., Effect of self- and group efficacy on group performance in a mixed-motive situation, HUM PERFORM, 13(3), 2000, pp. 279-298
Authors:
Mersman, JL
Donaldson, SI
Citation: Jl. Mersman et Si. Donaldson, Factors affecting the convergence of self-peer ratings on contextual and task performance, HUM PERFORM, 13(3), 2000, pp. 299-322
Authors:
Durham, CC
Locke, EA
Poon, JML
McLeod, PL
Citation: Cc. Durham et al., Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance, HUM PERFORM, 13(2), 2000, pp. 115-138