Authors:
GUIBELALDE E
VANO E
FERNANDEZ JM
MOLINERO A
ALBERDI J
MERILLAS A
Citation: E. Guibelalde et al., DESIGN OF A PC CONTROLLED TEST DEVICE FOR THE STUDY OF PATIENT MOTIONIN X-RAY RADIOLOGY - FIRST APPLICATIONS AND RESULTS, British journal of radiology, 71(851), 1998, pp. 1185-1191
Authors:
VANO E
GONZALEZ L
GUIBELALDE E
FERNANDEZ JM
TEN JI
Citation: E. Vano et al., RADIATION EXPOSURE TO MEDICAL STAFF IN INTERVENTIONAL AND CARDIAC RADIOLOGY, British journal of radiology, 71(849), 1998, pp. 954-960
Citation: E. Vano et al., LENS INJURIES INDUCED BY OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE IN NON-OPTIMIZED INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY LABORATORIES, British journal of radiology, 71(847), 1998, pp. 728-733
Authors:
VANO E
ARRANZ L
SASTRE JM
MORO C
LEDO A
GARATE MT
MINGUEZ I
Citation: E. Vano et al., DOSIMETRIC AND RADIATION PROTECTION CONSIDERATIONS BASED ON SOME CASES OF PATIENT SKIN INJURIES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, British journal of radiology, 71(845), 1998, pp. 510-516
Citation: Mj. Ruiz et al., DOSE-AREA PRODUCT VALUES IN FREQUENTLY PERFORMED COMPLEX PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY EXAMINATIONS, British journal of radiology, 69(818), 1996, pp. 160-164
Citation: M. Chevalier et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DOSE VALUES AND IMAGE QUALITY IN MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE MADRID AREA, British journal of radiology, 69(817), 1996, pp. 42-48
Authors:
GUIBELALDE E
MORILLO A
FERNANDEZ JM
VANO E
Citation: E. Guibelalde et al., USE OF THE EUROPEAN IMAGE QUALITY CRITERIA FOR SCREEN-FILM COMPARISON- APPLICATION FOR ASYMMETRIC SYSTEMS, British journal of radiology, 69(817), 1996, pp. 64-69
Citation: E. Vano et al., INITIATIVES, ACHIEVEMENTS AND PERSPECTIVES IN SPAIN CONCERNING QUALITY ASSURANCE AND RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR-MEDICINE - APPENDIX 11, Radiation protection dosimetry, 57(1-4), 1995, pp. 66-68
Authors:
ORTIZ P
MACCIA C
PADOVANI R
VANO E
CARLSSON GA
SCHIBILLA H
Citation: P. Ortiz et al., RESULTS OF THE IAEA-CEC COORDINATED RESEARCH-PROGRAM ON RADIATION-DOSES IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY AND METHODS FOR REDUCTION, Radiation protection dosimetry, 57(1-4), 1995, pp. 95-99
Citation: M. Chevalier et al., IMPACT OF SEVERAL RECOMMENDED ACTIONS FOR IMPROVING IMAGE QUALITY IN MAMMOGRAPHY, Radiation protection dosimetry, 57(1-4), 1995, pp. 155-158
Authors:
VANO E
GONZALEZ L
GUIBELALDE E
FERNANDEZ JM
CALZADO A
RUIZ MJ
Citation: E. Vano et al., SOME RESULTS FROM A DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM IN THE MADRID AREA, Radiation protection dosimetry, 57(1-4), 1995, pp. 289-292
Citation: A. Calzado et al., A COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND CALCULATED ORGAN DOSES FROM CT EXAMINATIONS, Radiation protection dosimetry, 57(1-4), 1995, pp. 381-385
Citation: P. Moran et al., RECOMMENDED ACTIONS FOR REDUCTION OF BREAST DOSES IN THE AREA OF MADRID - AN EVALUATION, Radiation protection dosimetry, 57(1-4), 1995, pp. 429-432
Authors:
VANO E
OLIETE S
GONZALEZ L
GUIBELALDE E
VALASCO A
FERNANDEZ JM
Citation: E. Vano et al., IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE IN LUMBAR SPINE EXAMINATIONS - RESULTS OF A 5-YEAR QUALITY-CONTROL PROGRAM FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN QUALITY CRITERIA TRIAL, British journal of radiology, 68(816), 1995, pp. 1332-1335
Authors:
VANO E
GUIBELALDE E
MORILLO A
ALVAREZPEDROSA CS
FERNANDEZ JM
Citation: E. Vano et al., EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN IMAGE QUALITY CRITERIA FOR CHEST EXAMINATIONS, British journal of radiology, 68(816), 1995, pp. 1349-1355
Citation: L. Gonzalez et al., RADIATION-DOSES TO PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING MICTURATING CYSTOURETHROGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS AND POTENTIAL REDUCTION BY RADIATION PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION, British journal of radiology, 68(807), 1995, pp. 291-295
Citation: P. Moran et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DOSE VALUES AND IMAGE QUALITY IN MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE AREA OF MADRID, British journal of radiology, 67(798), 1994, pp. 556-563
Citation: E. Guibelalde et E. Vano, DESIGN CRITERIA FOR AND EVALUATION OF PHANTOMS EMPLOYED IN CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY, Radiation protection dosimetry, 49(1-3), 1993, pp. 39-46
Citation: Al. Llorca et al., ANALYSIS OF IMAGE QUALITY PARAMETERS USING A COMBINATION OF AN ANSI TYPE PHANTOM AND THE LEEDS TOR(CDR) TEST OBJECT IN SIMULATIONS OF SIMPLE EXAMINATIONS, Radiation protection dosimetry, 49(1-3), 1993, pp. 47-49
Citation: P. Moran et al., EVALUATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF THE LEEDS TOR(MAX) MAMMOGRAPHIC PHANTOM, Radiation protection dosimetry, 49(1-3), 1993, pp. 163-166