Citation: A. Weis, COMMERCE CLAUSE IN THE CROSS-HAIRS - THE USE OF LOPEZ-BASED MOTIONS TO CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL STATUTES, Stanford law review, 48(5), 1996, pp. 1431-1467
Citation: I. Ayres et P. Cramton, DEFICIT REDUCTION THROUGH DIVERSITY - HOW AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION AT THE FCC INCREASED AUCTION COMPETITION, Stanford law review, 48(4), 1996, pp. 761-815
Citation: Dl. Sloss, THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE HOW TO DIE - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF STATE LAWS PROHIBITING PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED, Stanford law review, 48(4), 1996, pp. 937-973
Citation: M. Cloud, THE 4TH-AMENDMENT DURING THE LOCHNER ERA - PRIVACY, PROPERTY, AND LIBERTY IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, Stanford law review, 48(3), 1996, pp. 555-631
Citation: Lr. Eskow, THE ULTIMATE WEAPON - DEMYTHOLOGIZING SPOUSAL RAPE AND RECONCEPTUALIZING ITS PROSECUTION, Stanford law review, 48(3), 1996, pp. 677-709
Citation: Ls. Chancer, DEFENDING PORNOGRAPHY - FREE SPEECH, SEX, AND THE FIGHT FOR WOMENS RIGHTS - STROSSEN,N, Stanford law review, 48(3), 1996, pp. 739-760
Citation: Mt. Johnson, SPECULATING ON THE EFFICACY OF SPECULATION - AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRUDENT PERSONS SLIPPERIEST TERM OF ART IN LIGHT OF MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY, Stanford law review, 48(2), 1996, pp. 419-447