Citation: Wh. Simon, The legal and the ethical in legal ethics: A brief rejoinder to comments on The Practice of Justice, STANF LAW R, 51(4), 1999, pp. 991-1006
Citation: Eg. Franklin, Waiving prosecutorial disclosure in the guilty plea process: A debate on the merits of "discovery" waivers, STANF LAW R, 51(3), 1999, pp. 567-595
Citation: D. Shestowsky, Where is the common knowledge? Empirical support for requiring expert testimony in sexual harassment trials, STANF LAW R, 51(2), 1999, pp. 357-386
Citation: Mm. Werdegar, Enjoining the constitution: The use of public nuisance abatement injunctions against urban street gangs, STANF LAW R, 51(2), 1999, pp. 409-445
Citation: Js. Schacter, THE CONFOUNDING COMMON-LAW ORIGINALISM IN RECENT SUPREME-COURT STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY DEBATE AND BEYOND, Stanford law review, 51(1), 1998, pp. 1-71
Citation: Lb. Epstein, WHAT IS A GENDER NORM AND WHY SHOULD WE CARE - IMPLEMENTING A NEW THEORY IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAW, Stanford law review, 51(1), 1998, pp. 161-182
Citation: A. Weis, JUMPING THE QUEUE - AN INQUIRY INTO THE LEGAL TREATMENT OF STUDENTS WITH LEARNING-DISABILITIES - KELMAN,M, LESTER,G, Stanford law review, 51(1), 1998, pp. 183-219
Citation: A. Vermeule, LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL COMPETENCE - THE UNTOLD STORY OF HOLY-TRINITY-CHURCH, Stanford law review, 50(6), 1998, pp. 1833-1896
Citation: R. Delgado, THE BELL-CURVE - INTELLIGENCE AND CLASS-STRUCTURE IN AMERICAN LIFE - HERRNSTEIN,RJ, MURRAY,C, Stanford law review, 50(6), 1998, pp. 1929-1957