Citation: Fu. Pappi et G. Eckstein, Voters' party preferences in multiparty systems and their coalitional and spatial implications: Germany after unification, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 229-255
Authors:
Schofield, N
Martin, AD
Quinn, KM
Whitford, AB
Citation: N. Schofield et al., Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on multinomial probit, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 257-293
Citation: Jw. Endersby et Se. Galatas, British parties and spatial competition: Dimensions of party evaluation inthe 1992 election, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 363-382
Citation: Jfs. Hsieh et al., Retrospective and prospective voting in a one-party-dominant democracy: Taiwan's 1996 presidential election, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 383-399
Citation: Mm. Kaminski et al., The "revival of communism" or the effect of institutions?: The 1993 Polishparliamentary elections, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 429-449
Citation: Jk. Dow, A spatial analysis of candidate competition in dual member districts: The 1989 Chilean senatorial elections, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 451-474
Citation: K. Banaian et al., RECONSIDERING THE PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE -THE MORE THE MERRIER, Public choice, 97(1-2), 1998, pp. 1-12
Citation: N. Longley, LEGISLATIVE SYSTEMS WITH ABSOLUTE PARTY DISCIPLINE - IMPLICATIONS FORTHE AGENCY THEORY APPROACH TO THE CONSTITUENT-LEGISLATOR LINK, Public choice, 97(1-2), 1998, pp. 121-140