Citation: Da. Hostetler, FACE-TO-FACE WITH THE FIRST-AMENDMENT - SCHENCK V. PRO-CHOICE NETWORKAND THE RIGHT TO APPROACH AND OFFER IN ABORTION CLINIC PROTESTS, Stanford law review, 50(1), 1997, pp. 179-223
Citation: Pl. Bryan, STORIES IN FICTION AND IN FACT - GLASPELL,SUSAN A JURY OF HER PEERS AND THE 1901 MURDER TRIAL OF HOSSACK,MARGARET, Stanford law review, 49(6), 1997, pp. 1293-1363
Citation: C. Haney, VIOLENCE AND THE CAPITAL JURY - MECHANISMS OF MORAL DISENGAGEMENT ANDTHE IMPULSE TO CONDEMN TO DEATH, Stanford law review, 49(6), 1997, pp. 1447-1486
Citation: Ma. Heinicke, THE ABA SHOULD NOT DELAY ON PAY-TO-PLAY - REGULATING THE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF LAWYERS TO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHO AWARD LEGAL CONTRACTS, Stanford law review, 49(6), 1997, pp. 1523-1546
Citation: A. Kozinski et H. Susman, ORIGINAL MEANINGS - POLITICS AND IDEAS IN THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION - RAKOVE,JN, Stanford law review, 49(6), 1997, pp. 1583-1605
Citation: Ww. Fisher, TEXTS AND CONTEXTS - THE APPLICATION TO AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY OF THEMETHODOLOGIES OF INTELLECTUAL HISTORY, Stanford law review, 49(5), 1997, pp. 1065-1110
Citation: R. Siegel, WHY EQUAL-PROTECTION NO LONGER PROTECTS - THE EVOLVING FORMS OF STATUS-ENFORCING STATE ACTION, Stanford law review, 49(5), 1997, pp. 1111-1148
Citation: Am. Dussias, GHOST DANCE AND HOLY GHOST - THE ECHOES OF 19TH-CENTURY CHRISTIANIZATION POLICY IN 20TH-CENTURY NATIVE-AMERICAN FREE EXERCISE CASES, Stanford law review, 49(4), 1997, pp. 773-852
Citation: Ja. Martin, ARBITRATING IN THE ALPS RATHER THAN LITIGATING IN LOS-ANGELES - THE ADVANTAGES OF INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION, Stanford law review, 49(4), 1997, pp. 917-970