Citation: Mm. Shors, UNITED-STATES V WATTS - UNANSWERED QUESTIONS, ACQUITTAL ENHANCEMENTS,AND THE FUTURE OF DUE-PROCESS AND THE AMERICAN CRIMINAL JURY, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1349-1393
Citation: Nw. Spaulding, THE PROPHET AND THE BUREAUCRAT - POSITIONAL CONFLICTS IN-SERVICE PRO-BONO-PUBLICO, Stanford law review, 50(4), 1998, pp. 1395-1434
Citation: S. Issacharoff et Rh. Pildes, POLITICS AS MARKETS - PARTISAN LOCKUPS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 643-717
Citation: Rl. Hasen, THE POLITICAL MARKET METAPHOR AND ELECTION LAW - A COMMENT ON ISSACHAROFF AND PILDES, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 719-730
Citation: I. Ayres et J. Bulow, THE DONATION BOOTH - MANDATING DONOR ANONYMITY TO DISRUPT THE MARKET FOR POLITICAL INFLUENCE, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 837-891
Citation: Sg. Calabresi, NEW FEDERALIST-PAPERS - ESSAYS IN DEFENSE OF THE CONSTITUTION - BRINKLEY,A, POLSBY,NW, SULLIVAN,KM, Stanford law review, 50(3), 1998, pp. 1015-1053
Citation: K. Clark, PAYING THE PRICE FOR HEIGHTENED ETHICS SCRUTINY - LEGAL DEFENSE FUNDSAND OTHER WAYS THAT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS PAY THEIR LAWYERS, Stanford law review, 50(1), 1997, pp. 65-138
Citation: Dp. Blank, SUPPRESSING DEFENDANTS IDENTITY AND OTHER STRATEGIES FOR DEFENDING AGAINST A CHARGE OF ILLEGAL REENTRY AFTER DEPORTATION, Stanford law review, 50(1), 1997, pp. 139-177